User:Ilikelinguistics/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Rhinoglottophilia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it was related to linguistics which is a topic I am greatly interested in. This article specifically is discussing a word relating to linguistics which was termed by James A Matisoff. My first impression was that the article was highly specific and quite short. It provided a lot of information on one particular topic.

Evaluate the article
Lead section

- The lead section gave a description of the topic very briefly and with an adequate amount of detail

- The section did not provide details on the main elements of the article

content

- Most of the content is recent.

- The information in the article is all connected to the topic of rhinoglottophilia

- There could be additional information added to the article. For instance, where the actual meaning or the term originates and why it is known as rhinoglottophilia.

- The article does not deal with any equity gaps.

tone and balance

- The article is written with no biased language and does not have strong biased language at all.

- There are no instances of persuasion to the reader in terms of positions

- Viewpoints are not discussed and are therefore not under/mis represented.

sources and references

- The sources are recent

- Some of the links did not link to an appropriate page to match the source

-Some paragraphs did not contain a source and some information seemed to be missing references.

- The sources are from a good reliable source

organization and writing quality

- The article does not have any grammar issues

- It is written in a concise way with a good amount of detail

- The organization of information could have been rearranged to make it flow more smoothly.

images and media

- The article does not have an images

talk page discussion

- The Talk page has a conversation discussing the narrowness of the topic.

It is part of the Linguistics Wikiproject

overall impressions

- The article is well written and uses neutral and concise language. It provides information on the term rhinoglottophilia and it's historical information.

- the article could be strengthen by adding additional information of the terms origins and coining. It may also be a good idea to add subheading to help organize the information.