User:IllusiveAttic11/Enrique Angelelli/Nativeteacher Peer Review

General info
IllusiveAttic11
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:IllusiveAttic11/Enrique_Angelelli&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template&veaction=edit&redirect=no
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Enrique Angelelli

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The article is informative and neutral. The original article has a lead that is good. It was not worked on in the draft, since the editor thought it did not need work. The added content is relative to the topic. The content is neutral and objective, it does not appear to have any biases written into it. The sources that were added are reliable secondary sources. Some sections could use additional sources being added to support the content given. The content that is added is clear, concise and neutral. The organization of the work makes sense. The original article does have a photo and it has not been changed. It is a photo of Enrique Angelelli, which makes sense, since the article is about him. The content that was added did improve the article, overall. The article could use the addition of a few more source references.

The article does not make claims on unnamed groups. It does not focus too much on the positive or negative of a group.