User:IllyFerg/Neolithic decline/Pyruvate kinase Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

IllyFerg

All the information added was very relevant to the topic; the source links work. The viewpoint presented is neutral and evidence-based, and I think it’s overall a very solid addition to the “Plague” section of the article. I do, however, think that you probably don’t need to mention the author’s name of the study you’re referencing at the very beginning of the article. You can probably just state it as a fact, and the fact that you’ve cited the author should be sufficient.


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)