User:Ilovecscw/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * List of Italian regions by GDP
 * Article Evaluation      Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * yes Is it written neutrally?   yes  Does each claim have a citation?  yes  Are the citations reliable?  yes  Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?   idk  Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.   quality scale: list-class  importance scale: low-importance
 * yes Is it written neutrally?   yes  Does each claim have a citation?  yes  Are the citations reliable?  yes  Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?   idk  Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.   quality scale: list-class  importance scale: low-importance


 * Sources

NUTS (Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics) - regulated by the EU, covers EU member states in detail, Istituto Nazionale di Statistica, OECD Stats

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Education in Italy
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * yes Is it written neutrally?   yes  Does each claim have a citation?  yes  Are the citations reliable?  yes  Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?   yes? ( A wide gap exists between northern schools, which perform near average, and schools in the South, that had much poorer results.)  Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.   quality scale: B/C-class  importance scale: high-importance
 * yes Is it written neutrally?   yes  Does each claim have a citation?  yes  Are the citations reliable?  yes  Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?   yes? ( A wide gap exists between northern schools, which perform near average, and schools in the South, that had much poorer results.)  Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.   quality scale: B/C-class  importance scale: high-importance


 * Sources
 * LOTS of reliable sources

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Digital divide
 * Global digital divide
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * yes Is it written neutrally?   eh (examples and perspective in this article may not represent a worldwide view of the subject)  Does each claim have a citation?  yes  Are the citations reliable?  yes  Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?   yes  Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.   quality scale: start-class  importance scale: mid-importance
 * yes Is it written neutrally?   eh (examples and perspective in this article may not represent a worldwide view of the subject)  Does each claim have a citation?  yes  Are the citations reliable?  yes  Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?   yes  Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.   quality scale: start-class  importance scale: mid-importance


 * Sources
 * LOTS of reliable sources
 * LOTS of reliable sources

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Culture of Italy
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * yes Is it written neutrally?   yes  Does each claim have a citation?  yes  Are the citations reliable?  yes  Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?   idk  Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.   quality scale: B-class  importance scale: top-importance
 * yes Is it written neutrally?   yes  Does each claim have a citation?  yes  Are the citations reliable?  yes  Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?   idk  Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.   quality scale: B-class  importance scale: top-importance


 * Sources
 * LOTS of reliable sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Science and technology in Italy
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * yes Is it written neutrally?   yes  Does each claim have a citation?  yes  Are the citations reliable?  yes  Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?   idk  Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.   quality scale: C-class  importance scale: high-importance
 * yes Is it written neutrally?   yes  Does each claim have a citation?  yes  Are the citations reliable?  yes  Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?   idk  Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.   quality scale: C-class  importance scale: high-importance


 * Sources
 * LOTS of reliable sources