User:Ilovesushilol15/Moderne architecture/Cosmo1836 Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:

The lead has been updated with more information regarding Moderne Architecture. It has many sentences introducing the origins of Moderne Architecture, making it a little lengthy for a lead. The lead does not however include a brief description of the sections of the article but is rather general. I would say, it is a little over detailed.

Content:

The content added is both relevant and credible, it is up to date and important to the topic discussed. The article chosen is interesting because it tackles an underrepresented field, which is architectural styles.

Tone and Balance:

The tone used is very informative and neutral, there was no bias or argument whatsoever, just plain facts, dates, and statistics.

Sources and References:

Good choice of sources and good use of the information provided in the sources. The resources are not correctly cited though.

Organization:

Organization of paragraphs could use a little work, the lead information could be moved to a separate paragraph and organized in a more cohesive, understandable manner.

Images and Media:

No use of any media or images, however I would recommend providing properly cited images related to moderne architecture.

Overall Impressions:

With a few tweaks here and there, the article wouldn't have any issues and I would count it as a successful addition of information to the style of Moderne Architecture. A style that wasn't previously discussed in depth.