User:Iluvskeleton/Emergency Severity Index/Isa2114 Peer Review

General info
Iluvskeleton
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Iluvskeleton/Emergency Severity Index - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Emergency Severity Index - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
The updated lead section provides very good detail on what the article is about. As someone who doesn't have any background on this subject, the added information helped me better understand what the article is about. All the content added to the article is relevant to the topic and very informative. I like how there was a comparison made with the algorithms that other countries use. The content is neutral and unbiased. Adding information on when the Emergency Severity Index should and should not be used helped the article stay on a more neutral path verses the original article just what it is and how it works. There were many sources added to the article and all the sources checked supported the changes made to the article and the links worked. The image added works very well in the article where it is placed and helps support the article by laying out the different levels on the ESI scale. Overall, I think the changes made to this article were all very good and I don't see where more improvement could be made. The added content helps give a better understanding on the topic.