User:Immcarle125/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * NLRP


 * Article Evaluation
 * The content of the article is relevant to the topic and always connects to the protein being described, however, there are no references from the past 5 years, so it needs to be updated. Each section is simply 2-3 sentences long. I encourage more elaboration and search for relevant references that can be included. Also, including images or figures would be helpful content to the article's development.

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Macrophage-1 antigen


 * Article Evaluation
 * There are not many sections to this article. The lead fails to direct and organize the article information. I think the information present in the function section can be divided and further investigated. With more structure and additional information, the article will be complete.

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Bone-marrow derived macrophage


 * Article Evaluation
 * The article only includes a lead and does not further elaborate on bone-marrow derived macrophage research. The author working on the article now has included few articles on the talk page that would help improve the content of the article. I think there will be more progress in the development of this article.

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Complement component 9


 * Article Evaluation
 * While the content on the topic is relevant and the writing is neutral, the information is very limited. There should be a section further describing its function. This could be found in an article that describes what occurs when the component is blocked. The talk page does not include any information or recommedations for the articles development.

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Interleukin-19


 * Article Evaluation
 * This article is very well structured, including sections that go into detail of the protein function. There are very recent references and an unbiased tone throughout the article. The talk page indicates that the article has a stub-rating, so a lot of progress needs to be made to be a developing article.