User:Immcarle67/sandbox

Article evaluation
From a first reading, the following observations have been made:

1. All information presented in the article is relevant. Very few distractions - the article is relatively short anyways.

2. The article appears neutral overall. No heavy opinions expressed.

3. The sections are not evenly presented - some information in underrepresented.

4. Citations look good, but there should be more diversity. Information should be coming from independent areas of knowledge and fields.

5. Overall, missing information. Expansion of sections is necessary. More resources should be included.

Annotated Bibliography and Editing plan
My plan for editing is read the relevant articles and book chapters on B-cell receptor with my focus being on finding information that would enrich the missing parts of my article. It is very likely that these sources will direct me to other sources too. I will keep this section updated in such a case.
 * 1) B-cell receptor, Lackie, John, Oxford University Press, A Dictionary of Biomedicine
 * 2) B-cell receptor, Brezski, Randall ; Monroe, John, 2008, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology[Peer Reviewed Journal]
 * 3) Immunology, infection, and immunity, Gerald Bryan Pier ; Jeffrey B Lyczak ; Lee M Wetzler, Washington, D.C. : ASM Press
 * 4) Glycoimmunology, Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Wiley Series in Drug Discovery and Development, Carbohydrate Recognition, Chapter 8, p.181-203
 * 5) Immunological Synapse, Takashi Saito ; Facundo D. Batista; Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg