User:Imperialrussia1/Chigirin Affair/Reidy3 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Imperialrussia1


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Imperialrussia1/Chigirin Affair


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
This article, although unfinished, has a solid structure and a good amount of information providing a good overview for the Chigirin Affair. The overarching structure, marked by the largest subtitles "Phase 1" and "Phase 2", is good, however the subtitles and sections below those were a bit confusing. I understood they were all a part of the affair, however I think it would make for a more clarifying read to roll over some of those into larger sections, especially ones like "Atoviki" and "Dusheviki" which are just definitions and probably do not need their own section, unless you plan on expanding them significantly. Utilizing the general phase 1 and phase 2 references, I think it might be best to organize everything in chronological order like your other article. The content within the article is all notable information without going into unnecessary detail. The writing is solid, however there are some typos and grammatical errors that would improve the article once fixed; I once again assume all of that would be solved upon publishing regardless of my peer review, however I thought id mention it anyways. Once again I didn't see any sources in the sandbox, so I am unable to speak on that. I felt a neutral tone while reading, and being a new article, I think it follows the standard wiki requirements. All that needs to be improved is just in terms of organization, writing, and content expansion.