User:Improv/arbcom disendorsements

Radman1
I would guess, although he provided no content to his disendorsement, that Radman is unhappy because I vocally opposed the existance of a page on him that I see as vanity and not notable. The page has been on VfD twice, and I honestly don't think he, or anything he has done, is notable. I have nothing personal against him though. --Improv 21:19, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Another possibility is that this is just more ugly deletionist/inclusionist political conflict. *sigh* --Improv 10:20, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)

HistoryBuffEr
Says I'm full of bias. I'm not sure where he got that impression from. I would appreciate some kind of hint as to what kind of bias I'm full of. --Improv 05:18, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Everyking
Might be personal, might not be. He's been working on an absurdly long article on a particular pop music song, which I thought was not at all notable nor encyclopedic. I put it on VfD, and he's obviously not happy about that. I'm by no means alone in my opinion that it's nonnotable -- the VfD discussion is pretty lively. On the other hand, perhaps he is just bothered by my not being an inclusionist. I fail to see how the inclusionist/deletionist division comes into play in this election. --Improv 15:16, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)