User:Imunsureofmostthings/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Internalized sexism

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose the article because it relates to my course and is something I am interested in further learning about and contributing to from an educational standpoint, of course. Internalized sexism, along with any form of internalized feelings of being less than others in some way, can lead to an incredibly stressful and even painful existence, not at all times but enough of the time that if it can be remedied, then it should, and since the remedy need only be a better understanding of what it is, where it comes from, and how to deal with it, I figure I can help someone who is dealing with internalized sexism onto the road towards a healthier view of themselves and their gender. I haven't experienced this (I have experienced internalized racism, so I have a rough idea), though, so perhaps I'm not the most qualified to attempt to do so, but I know there are others to help me should I fail to contribute in a way that is helpful. Also, since the writing needs to be less opinionated and more focused on what reputable sources have to say, then maybe my inexperience is not an incredible burden. At first glance, the article looks solid; it just needs to be developed a bit more.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section does not talk about types, modes, or how to combat. Needs more content all around, but particularly in the media section or the combating section. There are many places deeper into the article where citations are needed or are lacking. Where sources are good, there is at least one source for each statement, but perhaps there should be more. The sources are largely current. The tone is largely unproblematic. There are no images or other pieces of visual media. It is pretty well written; maybe it could be more organized, but honestly, as it becomes better developed, then the organization will be easier. Overall, it is certainly still in development, but there is strong writing and a variety of sub-topics. The article can be improved, as previously explained, but if I were to pick a particular focus, it would be updating the references and fleshing out the combating internalized sexism section. Looking for more sources and expanding on the aforementioned parts that are lacking in some ways would likely be the best step forward. There have been a couple of wiki projects related to this topic. The talk page seems generally productive. There is, in all honesty, even a better evaluation that was recently made and brings up many of my points more effectively. Conversations are often centered around what should go in, what shouldn't, and how it can be improved. I realize I was looking at the earlier part of the talk, and I think no one has done much with the article since last summer. The guide says I should mark this complete but I am unsure how to.