User:Indislo/Censorship by Apple/ChaseGil Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Indislo


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Censorship by Apple


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

"censorship by apple" that Indislo is working on, stays on track of the over subject of the article. There are no distractions that grab my attention that bring me off topic. It has certain little articles where it gives an example of something that happened in the past that apple had to take down for specific reasons which I think is really good because it keeps you on track and gives a lot of information. The article is neutral, it doesn't any biased information towards it. None of the information is over/unrepresented, it gives a brief description on what apple had to do to a certain ebook, or newspaper or magazine that they had to get rid of because of something bad that happened in it that didn't meet there policies. All the content is easy to read and understand, and you don't get confused or get off topic. Also the article is very well organized and nothing is out of place or mixed up. All the links work within the article and the sources also support the claims. There are some good pictures that have to so with the information giving in the article. There are no pictures that are in the article that has nothing to so with the subject. Overall, this articles gives good information about what apple does that doesn't meet the criteria and it stays on topic very well so there is no distractions and gets you off topic, there are pictures and great content within the article.