User:Ines.soares60/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating? I am evaluating the article on Loris, subspecies of primates
(Loris)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate? I chose this article because it is related to the course, geog 479 and also because the article seems to lack a lot of information.
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

== Evaluate the article. The lead section is a bit too concise in my opinion and focuses too much on the taxonomy and classification instead of giving a brief introduction of the article. It also does not include any description of the article’s major sections. Regarding the content, it lacks many aspects as it only has two sections including the description, which could have been a bit more long in my opinion, and the taxonomy classification which is very complete. However, the article seems up to date as it was last edited this septembre 2022. Various different sources were used for this article so it lets us think that it is neutral. Furthermore, they all come from a reliable and professional background. The organisation of the article is pretty well done, the sections are clearly separated and identifiable. However, there could be more images relating to the topic in order to help visualize the information. The discussions are interesting and are giving real feedback to improve the article. Overall, I consider this article as having a good base but it undoubtedly needs more improvement and sections. ~ ==

(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)