User:Inexperienced Egg/Culture of Morocco/Igotnooname Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Inexperienced Egg


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Inexperienced Egg/Culture of Morocco
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Culture of Morocco

Evaluate the drafted changes
I enjoyed reading your article. It deals with one of the equity gaps on the Wikipedia page of Culture of Morocco.

The division of the section into different aspects of Moroccan manuscripts allows readers to get the article’s overall structure at first sight. The sections also suggest that the article has a balanced coverage on manuscripts, ranging from content to production method. The tone of the article is neutral. I understand that it could be a little difficult to find reliable sources on certain topics, but I think it would be helpful if you could have a few more sources to enrich and support the article.

The lead is concise. In my opinion, it could give a little more background information about Moroccan manuscripts and why they are important to know. For example,  when was it first created? What was the purpose of the manuscripts? etc. Therefore, by reading the first paragraph, readers could have a basic idea about the manuscripts and what they are going to get from the rest of the article. Pictures could also be helpful for readers to visualize a Moroccan manuscript, thus enhancing their learning experience.