User:Informaticsdoc/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (link)User experience
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.This is a topic that is important to the use of computers in healthcare. a poor user experience leads to clinician fatigue, system failure and misuse or destruction of the system.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? No, the lead is confusing and contans too many ideas.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? There is a table of contents but no description in the lead.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? The lead is lacking in content and confusing. It is therefore, unclear if everything is included in the article.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The lead is short but has too many ideas in it to make it ueful.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes, all content is relevant, but incomplete.
 * Is the content up-to-date? No, there is more current information.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? The article has a see also section that includes a clinical experience officer. The article does not mention healthcare prominently.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Article is neutral. This is not a controversial topic.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? None noitced.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? There is, perhaps, a bit too much reliance on social science aspects and not enough on practical experience.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, no evidence seen.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Without reading all the references, yes.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? No, the refernce list is incomplete and there are no external links.
 * Are the sources current? 2013 is the earliest. There are more recent articles on the subject.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Links work.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? No, it is confusing to read and not clear in many places.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? None seen.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Content outline is well organized but there are sections that should be added.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No images
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? Confusing, currency of articles and mention of some curious sources.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? It is C class and part of 4 projects.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? I don't think it does.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? Incomplete, in need of update and expansion
 * What are the article's strengths? Good content outline
 * How can the article be improved? Imporve currency of referneces, add external links. Expand content.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? Under developed.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Informaticsdoc&action=edit