User:Infrontofabeach/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Hiroshima Castle

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I searched articles from C-class articles and I found one that related to my home town. I think the problem of this article is that it is lacking information about the history and structure compared to the Japanese article. My preliminary impression was that it contained the history but present information was not enough.

Evaluate the article
Lead section: The lead includes the information that readers need to know what is about and explains concisely.

Content: This article is written about history and structure of Hiroshima Castle, but I think it needs more detail information. For instance, it says the castle is called Carp Castle but the reason isn’t written. Another example is that the detail about present use of the castle is not written.

Tone and balance: This article is written from a neutral point of view.

Sources and references: Reliable secondary sources are used and they work.

Organization and writing quality: This article is well-organized and it’s clear and easy to read, however it is short.

Images and media: The article includes five images and a map. They help readers understand what Hiroshima Castle is like.

Talk page discussion: There are no discussion and comment in talk page.

Overall impressions: