User:Insertcleverphrasehere/AFC stats

For each draft, record:

The expected AfC result if no improvements are made
 * Acceptable inputs in table: Decline, Accept, or Delete (such as for copyvios)
 * Do not perform a search for sources (AfC guidelines don't say to do so). Record your best guess as to the likelihood of it being declined or accepted.
 * Input what you think the likely outcome would be without a search, not necessarily what you decided on after searching.

The expected NPP result if found in the NPP queue as-is
 * Acceptable inputs in table: Review, Tag, CSD, AfD, PROD, BLPROD, Redirect, Draftify.
 * Follow the NPP flowchart if unsure and make a best guess as to the likely outcome for the submission if it was reviewed from mainspace, DO perform a notability search.
 * i.e. Write 'Review' if there are no issues, 'Tag' if there is something in the article that would require one or more maintenance tags, 'AfD' if you think that as an article it would get sent to AfD and deleted, etc.

Notable Y/N
 * Record the result of whether the topic is notable as Y, N, or Borderline (search and compare to subject specific guidelines).

Number of AfC declines so far
 * Record the number of red decline templates on the page before you decline it (if you decline it). These stats are for the three strikes proposal.