User:Inspiration 2.0/Esplanade Ave./Madisonbranch21 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Inspiration 2.0


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Inspiration 2.0/Esplanade Ave.


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Does not exist

Evaluate the drafted changes
The article is very relevant and up to date with the topic. The lead of the article is very short with a sense of persuasion to make the article more intriguing to read.The article is somewhat neutral but you can tell that the writer added their small opinions and "facts" to the article. The article is in sections from History, Attractions, Restaurants, and References. The viewpoints and text are presented very nicely and detail is category well. It is explained thoroughly without any negative connotation also. It is very easy to read and flows smoothly as the article goes along. The writer used viable references that work and entail explain each category better. They used reliable sources to entail their information also. The references are less biased and more persuasive to the topic.