User:IntPolCC/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Federal Executive Council (Yugoslavia)
 * Article evaluation:
 * This entire article is not completely relevant to the topic of International Politics, but I plan on explaining important events the Federal Executive council had to death with during their time.
 * For the small amount of information in the page, it is written neutrally. The only claims on the page are facts about what the Federal Executive Council was. There are no citations for this page. It is simply a stub translated from the Serbo-Croatian page. This article does not tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps, but this article needs important revisions.
 * In the talk page of this article, one author suggests merging this page with multiple other Federal Executive Council pages such as First Federal Executive Council of Džemal Bijedić. This article has a high importance level. I think this would be a very important article to write about, but I need to make sure it I can implement subject from our international politics class.
 * Sources
 * 1. Bertsch GK. Ethnicity and Politics in Socialist Yugoslavia. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 1977;433(1):88-99. doi:10.1177/000271627743300109
 * Sources
 * 1. Bertsch GK. Ethnicity and Politics in Socialist Yugoslavia. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 1977;433(1):88-99. doi:10.1177/000271627743300109
 * 1. Bertsch GK. Ethnicity and Politics in Socialist Yugoslavia. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 1977;433(1):88-99. doi:10.1177/000271627743300109

Option 2

 * Breakup of Yugoslavia
 * Article Evaluation:
 * I would consider this topic relevant to our course because there were many international factors to the breakup of Yugoslavia such as UN intervention in the multiple wars that occurred during the breakup.
 * The article is written neutrally. Most claims have a reliable citation on them, but there are large sections of the article that do not list any citations.
 * The talk page of this article is mainly talking about fixing issues already on the article. These are mostly confusion on which factions are considered illegitimate parts of the dissolution and which factions are recognized nations.
 * One point made by an author talks about how this article does not follow the WP:NPOV rule ; which means it is difficult for this article to be considered neutral because of the animosity between ethnic groups in Yugoslavia at the time, and how the article fails to include outside factors that may have caused the Yugoslav split. This would also be a good topic to expand upon.
 * Sources
 * Rogel, C., (2004). The breakup of Yugoslavia and its aftermath. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
 * Mrak, M., Rojec, M., & Silva-Jauregui, C. (2004). Slovenia : From yugoslavia to the european union. ProQuest Ebook Central https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.bw.opal-libraries.org
 * Ramcharan, B. G. (2011). Human rights and u. n. peace operations : Yugoslavia. ProQuest Ebook Central https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.bw.opal-libraries.org
 * Szamuely, G. (2014). Bombs for peace : Nato's humanitarian war on yugoslavia. ProQuest Ebook Central https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.bw.opal-libraries.org
 * Glaurdic, J. (2011). The hour of europe : Western powers and the breakup of yugoslavia. ProQuest Ebook Central https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.bw.opal-libraries.org
 * Note: Most of these sources also talk about actions done by the Federal Executive Council (Yugoslavia). They can be used interchangeably with one another.
 * Szamuely, G. (2014). Bombs for peace : Nato's humanitarian war on yugoslavia. ProQuest Ebook Central https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.bw.opal-libraries.org
 * Glaurdic, J. (2011). The hour of europe : Western powers and the breakup of yugoslavia. ProQuest Ebook Central https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.bw.opal-libraries.org
 * Note: Most of these sources also talk about actions done by the Federal Executive Council (Yugoslavia). They can be used interchangeably with one another.
 * Note: Most of these sources also talk about actions done by the Federal Executive Council (Yugoslavia). They can be used interchangeably with one another.

Option 3

 * United States–SFR Yugoslavia relations
 * Article Evaluation:
 * This article does not exist, but in the WikiProject Yugoslavia page, this is a requested article to be created. Although this is not a good plan for being my first Wiki edit, it is still good to consider it. This would fall under our international politics course. Another option which I think would be easier would be Soviet Union–SFR Yugoslavia relations since there was more tension between the two states, and they had more prominent relations due to the location of their states. I would need to do more research into these topics before making a decision.
 * Sources
 * Rajak, S. (2010). Yugoslavia and the soviet union in the early cold war : Reconciliation, comradeship, confrontation, 1953-1957. ProQuest Ebook Central https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.bw.opal-libraries.org
 * Sources
 * Rajak, S. (2010). Yugoslavia and the soviet union in the early cold war : Reconciliation, comradeship, confrontation, 1953-1957. ProQuest Ebook Central https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.bw.opal-libraries.org
 * Rajak, S. (2010). Yugoslavia and the soviet union in the early cold war : Reconciliation, comradeship, confrontation, 1953-1957. ProQuest Ebook Central https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.bw.opal-libraries.org

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources