User:IntlEd Matt/Culturally relevant teaching/Chunt25 Peer Review

The changes you have made to the article are easy to find, so thank you for that! LOL I also used "bolded" text style to differentiate between what I added to the original article.

Lead

After referencing the original lead to the Wikipedia page, I can definitely see the changes you have made in an effort to make your newly written lead encompass a much broader span of topics that you will touch on later in the article.

I see in your lead you mention that implementing Culturally Relevant Teaching can be challenging to some, I would assume that you would touch on that later in the article! In my opinion it is important to include not only the benefits of Culturally Relevant Teaching, but also the challenges some teachers may encounter on their journey to becoming more culturally relevant. This practice will allow you to keep the article unbiased!

Content

The content you have added so far is relevant to the topic of your article! I enjoy your neutrality when discussing culturally relevant teaching because as a person on the educational world today, we are told to be as culturally relevant as possible, making it easy to become biased without knowing. As of right now I would say that the overall topic of the positives of Culturally Relevant Teaching is over-represented, but as I mentioned before, I would assume that later on in the article you will discuss the challenges and negatives of the article. This will allow the article to maintain equal representation of both sides of this discussion.

Organization

I also just waned to touch on the organization of your revisions. I'm not sure how this would work, but maybe putting the additional practices in a specific order would help readers better understand them. This isn't crucial, but with my OCD Kicking in, I wished that they were in order by the ear the source was created. Another option you can do is to group them by source used such as putting all of the Gollnick and Chin practices together!