User:Invertebrate Zoology/Irukandji jellyfish/Gracieorwig Peer Review

Lead
 * no new content has been updated

content


 * content has been updated into a large paragraph
 * .content added is up to date
 * there is most likely content missing within certain specific areas that could be addressed within the content
 * the content represents a topic not well known but should be explored

tone and balance


 * the content is neutral sounding, no usage of specific pronouns. talks about the jellyifsh saying "they" or "the jellyfish"
 * no claim is heavily biased about a specific position
 * I think many points are heavily under-represented, what I mean is that there is only a basic layer of hte information that is presented in the content paragraph. I think there is room for more information to be added into it.

sources and references


 * the new content is supported by new references, all within the last few years
 * oldest reference is from 2008
 * sources are diverse and un-biased it seems
 * sources are thorough, and reflect good research on this species
 * the links do work

organization


 * the content is well-written, clear and to the point, but only the basic information is presented, could provide more detail
 * no errors that I could see while reading
 * the content is in a giant paragraph, could be dived into sections based on the content.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)