User:Invokerishard/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Computer science
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I choose this article because I'm a CS major student and I think it's easy for me to think about this article as a start.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? No

Lead evaluation
The lead of the article is concise. It's to the point of what the article and show all information that will present in the article.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?Yes
 * Is the content up-to-date?Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No

Content evaluation
The content of the article is relevant to the topic and the article is still up to date(AI is a new thing and it's been updated) and I also do not find content missing.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?No
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?No

Tone and balance evaluation
The article is neutral, and this article fully introduces the development of computer science and the continuous evolution of technology and has always maintained a neutral point of view. No attempt was made to seduce readers from other positions, and there were not many views

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?Yes
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work?Yes, it works

Sources and references evaluation
The cited sources of this article are all available and time-sensitive, they all reflect the truth of the topic, and are related to the topic.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?Yes
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?No
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?Yes

Organization evaluation
This article looks long because it contains a detailed history of computer development. If you are interested, you can jump directly to the part you want to see. The parts are well organized and there are no spelling errors.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?Yes
 * Are images well-captioned?Yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?Yes
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?Yes

Images and media evaluation
This article contains both images of people and pictures that show the usual meaning of computer science, which is concise and compliant

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Talk page evaluation
There is someone in the talk page and it's a part of WikiProjects. This article is Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? Very good
 * What are the article's strengths? Detailed and rich, suitable for both professionals and normal people
 * How can the article be improved? Of course.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? it's well-developed

Overall evaluation
I think that the entries in computer science are clear, and many illustrations are used to clearly express the public impression. It is a very good article, but for the final challenge title, I think that the main focus of computer science is the evolution of mathematics and thinking methods rather than It's the asymmetry of the sex ratio. It makes me feel disrespectful to women.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~Why the challenge is about gender gap.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Invokerishard/Evaluate_an_Article
 * Link to feedback:Talk:Computer science