User:IonaMink/Maternal wall/Ansan500 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

IonaMink


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:IonaMink/Maternal_wall?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Maternal wall
 * Maternal wall

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: The author has not added any information to the Lead section of the article yet.

Content: The author has added a thorough amount of additional detail to the Legal Implications and Court Cases sections of the article. I thought that this information was interesting, relevant, and well-presented.

Tone and Balance: The tone and balance of the writing seemed appropriate and neutral, especially given the addition of the historical context throughout the edits.

Sources: The sources added seemed relevant and credible. The only question that I had was in regard to where the information in the Court Cases section came from, as there was no citation. I am assuming it came from footnote 2, but re-citing this could be helpful since this is a different section of the article.

Organization: I thought that the article draft contained relevant sections of the article.