User:IqraSajjad1/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Khowar Language


 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * All the content in the article is relevant to the topic
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * The article is presented in a neutral point of view thus there are no claims that lean towards a particular side.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Most of the information in the article is from a reliable source except for some of the information in the lead section. That information is not cited so there is no way of knowing where it came from.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * All the sources cited are scholarly works by different linguists.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * The article deals with an endangered language hence it is a topic possibly related to an underrepresented population.
 * Overall:
 * It's a start but it's lacking a lot of information. Fortunately, it’s organized and easy to follow along. The article can be improved by adding more information and making sure everything is sourced.
 * Sources
 * Some other sources that could be used for this topic: Contact-induced change in Khowar, Development of Khowar as a Literacy Language, Results of interaction between linguists and language community: Case study in Chitral, Northern Pakistan, and Some Khowar Songs.

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Torwali Language


 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * The content in the article is relevant to the topic.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * The article is written in a neutral viewpoint so it doesn't try to sway the reader's opinion.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Yes, but one claim is repeated twice and has different citations each time. Thus, the other citations may not all be right.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Most of the sources cited are scholarly but there are a few that might not be.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * The article deals with an endangered language hence it is a topic possibly related to an underrepresented population.
 * Overall:
 * The information in the article is a start but its unorganized and lacking. Thus, the article can be improved by organizing the article and adding more information which is well cited.
 * Sources
 * Some other sources that could be used for this topic: Adapting the Multilingual Instrument for Narratives to Torwali, Early writing in Torwali in Pakistan, and Digital Dictionary Development for Torwali, a less-studied language: Process and Challenges.

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Kalasha-mun


 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * The information in the article is relevant to the topic.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * The information is written in a neutral viewpoint.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * The claims presented in the article all have citations.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * The cited source are scholarly articles so they are reliable.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * The article deals with an endangered language hence it is a topic possibly related to an underrepresented population.
 * Overall: The information in this article is easy to follow but more can be added. Thus, this article can be improved by adding more information that is cited.
 * Sources
 * Some other sources that could be used for this topic: Topics in Kalasha syntax: An areal and typological perspective, Kalasha texts--With introductory grammer, and An acoustic and articulatory study of laryngeal and place contrasts of Kalasha (Indo-Aryan, Dardic).