User:Ird003/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Pacific seahorse


 * Article Evaluation
 * Includes enough information for a foundation and starting point, but there isn't too much information and there will be definitely things for me to add. Also, the species is vulnerable which falls under the requirements. Does not have that many sources in the article. Also is low on importance scale and just starting off.


 * Sources
 * Just by doing a few minutes of research, I found multiple sources on the Pacific seahorse on Google Scholar, JSTOR and other reliable sites that make me confident there is enough information on this species.

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Common skate
 * Article Evaluation
 * Has a good amount of text but could find some things to had. Has a lot of sources. Species is critically endangered. Is rated "Mid" on the importance scale. Probably will be a little difficult to build off of.
 * Sources
 * There is plenty of information on this species from a number of reliable sources. However, a lot of it is already included in the article.
 * Sources
 * There is plenty of information on this species from a number of reliable sources. However, a lot of it is already included in the article.

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Kemp's ridley sea turtle


 * Article Evaluation
 * Is a pretty well-developed page with lots of information. Has a lot of references and would probably not be the best article to add on to. Rated as high on the importance scale.
 * Is a pretty well-developed page with lots of information. Has a lot of references and would probably not be the best article to add on to. Rated as high on the importance scale.


 * Sources
 * Lot of information can be found on this species, but again the page is already pretty well-developed and not suitable for this project.
 * Lot of information can be found on this species, but again the page is already pretty well-developed and not suitable for this project.

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources