User:Irisbishins/Japanese eel/Ird003 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Irisbishins


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Irisbishins/Japanese eel
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Japanese eel
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Japanese eel

Evaluate the drafted changes
The drafted changes include information on the breeding of the species, which is good since the original article does not include that much information on this specifically. It also includes a reference to correspond with this new information which is good. I like how the user plans to define scientific terms and refine things already present in the original article.

They should continue with their article draft by adding more, specifically on the conservation of the species, since there is no information on that in the original article. They should also attempt to explain the commercial fisheries portion of the article (since only pictures and figures are currently provided) and further elaborate on the medical use section, which is currently very brief.