User:Iriscalderon54/Robert Borosky/Ugottabekittenme Peer Review

Lead- overall the lead seems to have info but information that might work better in the contents or meat of the page. I believe by setting up ur page with a [Lead, early life, biography, publications/works, references, external links. I believe with that format the info you have can be complied in an easier and cleaner way. Its a lead at the end of the day, you don't need much just list the subject and leave any other info in its respective spot.

Pros:

-i can clearly see what the subject is (Robert Borofsky)

-Explains who Robert Borofsky is/qualifications

Cons:

-need more headings like lead or intro, biography, early life, etc

-needs a page guide (lead, contents, references, external links, etc

-pictures of borofsky, set up the usual Wikipedia style with a picture on the right with a birthday, profession, important docs, height, weight, etc

Content- the content is there because when I look at the sources I see alot of credible information that can/should be included but just seems rushed. I would personally add a section for the Yanomami because it is a pretty big topic that can be more presentable in its own subsection and that way can be elaborated on more without seeming like ur making the wiki page tiresome and easy to navigate.

Pros:

-there are examples of his works

-explained facts about his life with credible sources

Cons:

-use more information in the sources(elaborate more on the works Borofsky was apart of)

-could maybe separate the content into more sections? [Biography, early life, publications/works]

-Borofsky has done alot for the discipline of anthropology, but elaborating on big items like the Yanomami and public anthropology can have their own sub sections in "publications" and elaborate what the problem was, who were insiders/outsiders, and what did Borofsky specifically do during this instance

Sources/references- the references used were great but need to be used more. Alot of information in the sources isn't listed in the wiki page and I believe would add to the contents and make the page being bigger and easier to navigate.

Pros:

-all credible

-insightful information that explains Borofskys publications/credibility/important information

Cons:

-some references are repeats

-make an actual reference section dont mix it with publications

-highlight terms that already have a Wikipedia page (make the words blue = ctrl+k)

I personally believe if u add some pics and use the headings to your advantage that ur page will look a bit more professional and easier to navigate as well as having a little bit more information that would help the reader to understand Borofsky a bit more. Overall its a great start just need to touch it up and make it look fire🤠😎