User:IsaacM24/The Rewatchables/Madi.heisterman Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? IsaacM24
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:IsaacM24/The Rewatchables Podcast

Lead
The lead is well thought out. Having never heard of this podcast I feel I now have a general idea of what it entails and who hosts it. The introductory sentence is very clear and easy to understand. I think it could of had a bit more detail about the episodes, for example of average length of them and maybe a bit more of an explanation.

Content
The content all seems relevant and up to date. As this is a new article I think the information provided is excellent and provides the reader with the format of the podcasts and briefly explains the categories.

Sources and References
Lack of sources and references. I think there could be more references from the awards it has won?

Organization
Clear organization easy to read and appeals to the eye.

Images and Media
Not sure what happened to the image? It appears there was one but it got removed. I think the addition of the logo of the podcast is a great idea and would give the readers a good visual on the podcast for if they want to go look it up in the future.

For New Articles Only
This article seems to meet all of wikipedia's notability requirements except it does not have any sources which is a bit of an issue. I understand it is probably hard since it is a podcast. There might be resources on the awards and articles about the episodes? The article pattern seems to be similar to other articles and it has a nice layout. The article does not link to any other articles but I think this could easily be done in the future.

Overall impressions
Overall good article. I personally am not a podcast fan so have not heard of it but after reading the article I might have to take a listen to an episode or two...