User:Isaacyag/Neothais harpa/Svnnvs Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Issacag


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Isaacyag/Neothais harpa


 * Link to the current version of the article
 * Neothais harpa

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) * Is there anything from your review that impressed you? No because I notice that the draft and the original article are the same. Does not seem to have any new information added.
 * 3) Check the main points of the article:
 * 4) * Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? (and not the genus or family) No, He includes the genus and family, as well as the species.
 * 5) * Are the subtitles for the different sections appropriate? Yes.
 * 6) * Is the information under each section appropriate or should anything be moved? I think that he did very well in putting information in right sections. He's detailed.
 * 7) * Is the writing style and language of the article appropriate? (concise and objective information for a worldwide audience) Yes, it is clear and easy to understand.
 * 8) Check the sources:
 * 9) * Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number? No
 * 10) * Is there a reference list at the bottom? No
 * 11) * Is each of those sources linked with a little number? Yes
 * 12) * What is the quality of the sources? It's good in giving taxonomy information but there should be 4 more sources or more.
 * 13) Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above):
 * 14) * What changes do you suggest and how would they improve the article? Add a reference subheading
 * 15) * Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready? No. I notice that it's exactly the same as the original article. Maybe find other sources that mention your species and take notes and then use them to write more information on your species.
 * 16) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? Find more sources and write down notes from each source.
 * 17) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? No