User:IsaakatUC/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Eritrea

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article due to the fact that Eritrea is the birthplace of my parents.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section

includes an introductory sentence that concisely describes the articles topic. Includes brief description of topic. The lead section does not include information not present in the article. The lead is not very over detailed and is very concise.

Content

The content of the article is very relevant to the topic. Most of all the content is up to date. It does not however deal with Wikipedia's equity gaps. There are groups that are underrepresented.

Tone and balance

The article is fairly neutral. There aren't many signs of bias. There aren't any claims that are heavily biased. There are some topics that are underrepresented. Minority topics aren't covered a lot. The article does not try to persuade the reader.

Sources and references

All topics are backed up by sources that are reliable. Many of the sources are up to date. A lot of the sources vary from different types of authors. All links are working

Organization and writing quality

The article is clear and easy to read. I didn't find any spelling or grammar errors. The article is broken into well reflected sections.

Images and Media

The article includes many enhancing, well captioned images. The images do adhere to Wikipedia's copyright policies. The images are also laid out in an appealing way.

Talk page discussion

There are only 3 topics of discussion on the talk page. The page is rated a B and is part of multiple Wikiprojects. The way the discuss topics is very professional.

Overall impressions

The articles overall status is a B. Its strengths is its sources and images. I think it can improve on talking about the minorities and struggles of Eritreans. Overall I think this is a well developed page.