User:IsabelGue/Social cognitive theory/Vtrevizo18 Peer Review

General info
IsabelGue
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:IsabelGue/Social cognitive theory
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Social cognitive theory

Evaluate the drafted changes
'''Is everything in the article relevant to the topic? Is there anything that distracted you?'''

So far, everything in the article is relevant to the topic. The History and Overview sections of the article complement each other. I suggest the writer reformat and put the pieces after one another or consider merging the parts.

'''Is the content-neutral? Are there any claims that appear biased toward a particular position?'''

All the content featured in the new and old articles seems unbiased. The citations/references used also consist of unbiased content to support the claims.

Are there viewpoints that are overstated or underrepresented?

The only topic that was briefly discussed multiple times is Bandura's Booboo Doll concept (in the old article). Overall, the content is excellent and features only some concepts that are overstated. Each section gives a brief overview of the topic discussed

'''Citations: Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?'''

Does an appropriate, reliable reference support each fact?

The article consists of reliable references that are relevant to the topics discussed. So, one article and four books are used to support the Wiki article. The one citation link works perfectly fine, and the books were easily located on the CSUF Library website.

'''Is any information missing that should be added? Is the content well organized?'''

While reading the (new) content, it wasn't easy to decipher where it fit in the article. I suggest the writer think carefully about the article's formatting. In addition, the article can use some more embedded links to the models and concepts discussed that may be unfamiliar to the reader. Many embedded links do now have published wiki pages (red links).