User:Isabellalunads/Hunger in the United States/Zr-gpp-1 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Isabellalunads


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Isabellalunads/Hunger_in_the_United_States?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Hunger in the United States

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead section of the article does a good way of introducing the reader to what to expect in just a few short words. All of the information described in the "lead" is expanded and present in the article section. By reading the article and clicking on the references, they all seem up-to date and current research involving the food pantries. All of the works being cited and their links are functioning, there are no broken links. The references chosen go into detail about different food programs thoruhgout time and the locations. I only found one scholar reference, the rest are from websites and east bay newspaper, I think adding a bit more scholarly articles would've emphasized the subject.

The second section of the article about hunger by college students does a good job of providing data and stats. Being able to quantify the need of more food pantries for college students is important. Although most of the focus in that section of the article is on UC BERKELEY there are other examples of other universities and goes to show that college student hunger should be urgently addressed. There are no images added to this article and doesn't show any spelling or grammatical errors. One strength of this article is addign what is the difference between almshouse, food pantries, food closet, etc, they're not all the same thing. One thing to imrpove on is maybe adding more academic sources so it's not only one.