User:Isabellasiragusa/sandbox

Evaluation of article Reverse Racism

Everything is related to the topic and nothing is distracting. There are many examples to back the writers' claims. What could be improved is, as noted with a note in the article, the fact that it could use more secondary or tertiary sources. There could also be examples from more than just America and South Africa. The idea of reverse racism is already biased for white people against people of color, but it still remains fairly neutral and doesn't attack a group. Links to citations work and the sources they lead to are relevant to the topic. Information comes from journals and encyclopedias, along with other links and books. There are mostly primary but also some secondary and tertiary sources (a little lacking). In the talk page, there are conversations about racist statements and the fact that there need to be more sources (or about added sources that are good). It was the topic of discussion to delete it, but people chose to keep it up because there needs to be more coverage of discrimination. The article has not been rated on neither the quality nor the importance scale. It is part of WikiProject Discrimination.