User:Isabelwei77/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Ice hockey

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
The reason why I choose this "Wikipedia" is that hockey, a uniquely Canadian sport, remains synonymous with Canada. Meanwhile, it happens to be winter, a time when hockey is in full swing. To mention the first impressions of this Wikipedia, which is very authoritative and detailed.

Evaluate the article
Content

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

Yes, everything in the article is significant to the topic.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?

No.

Can you identify any notable equity gaps? Does the article underrepresent or misrepresent historically marginalized populations?

No, the article also features a section on women's ice hockey.

What else could be improved?

From my perspective, it could be described a little more in the section on the currently controversial hockey injuries.

Tone

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

Yes, the tone is relatively neutral.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

No.

Sources

Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

Yes.

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

Yes, most facts have reliable references, some information from the Official Canadian Sports Act, or from the Globe and Mail newspaper, every single one of them is an official subjective fact.

Do the sources come from a diverse array of authors and publications?

Yes, some of them come from the research of professors, some from the official laws of Canada or other countries.