User:IsaqueBrandao/Uridine diphosphate galactose/Eepygirl Peer Review

General info
IsaqueBrandao
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:IsaqueBrandao/Uridine diphosphate galactose
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Uridine diphosphate galactose

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: It does not appear that the lead was updated, but it sounds already relevant to the new paragraph that my classmate added to the article stub. It is concise and describes the article's topic briefly.

Content: The content added is relevant and up-to-date.

Tone and Balance: Yes, the added content is neutral.

Sources and References: Yes, all new content is accurately backed up with current and thorough secondary sources of information with working links.

Organization: The added content is well-written and well-organized. It could have a comma between "galactose" and "an epimer of glucose," but otherwise does not contain additional grammatical or spelling errors.

Images and Media: Yes, there is a clear image of the compound's structure with plenty of relevant info beneath it.