User:Ishubatt/Leigh Janiak/Vicccshi Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Ishubatt


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Ishubatt/Leigh Janiak


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Leigh Janiak

Evaluate the drafted changes
Very great job!

The lead is concise, including a brief description of the following article that give me a good overview of the content. The content you've added really help to improve the original article and gives a more exhaustive description of your filmmaker. Your contents are concise, all relevant to the topic, and you organized your content very well, with no grammatical issues and easy to understand. Meanwhile, your content is neutral, and you've incorporate links to other articles to make it more discoverable. Moreover, from your content, I could tell that you've did lots of research and possesses a strong summarizing skill.

I don't know if I didn't see your reference section. I only saw a section named 'sources' that listed the sources that you incorporated. However, I think the current one is not cited in the right format. You could click on the cite button the the tool bar to link your reference to the content you've added. From your sources section, I find some of the sources are from interviews which are reliable, but some others are from blog posted which doesn't count as a reliable source. All the film you incorporate are from wikipedia which is not a reliable source.

'''I am taking out the blog post. I only needed it to get a better sense of the film. They're listed under sources at the bottom of my article because I couldn't figure out how to get them in the reference section, so I will do what you suggested. I will also take out my wikipedia sources.'''

In all, I can see your efforts on doing research and your content is really strong and strengthen the original article. I think you should work on your reference link and citation to make your article more complete and adhere to the copy right policy of Wikipedia.