User:Isispiti/sandbox

Article Evaluation
"Lappet-Faced Vulture" 
 * 1) As I read through the article on the lappet-faced vulture, I noticed that everything in the article was relevant to the topic. Evidently, leading to the topic of the article which was the history of the African bird. Most importantly, the article provided framework about the status of the lappet-faced vulture. What distracted me was the fact that the population is decreasing in size due to the dreadful activities humans were conducting in hopes of their extinction. These activities included poisoning the carcass purposefully so that attendance in properties were minimized.
 * 2) The article appeared neutral, all information was provided through reliable sources and not blogs or personal accounts.
 * No, I believe that each section of the article was evenly represented in order to give valid information needed to clarify the overall topic of each section.
 * 1) In the reference section with the links, all are working properly and relate to the article's overall message. For instance, IUCN Red List of Threatened species list the lappet-faced vulture as a possible target for extinction. In the status section of the article, it elaborately explores this ideology.
 * 2) Each reference is a neutral and reliable because it comes from dependable publishers and credible wikipedia accounts.
 * No, the article provides relevant and factual information and is not out of date. The earliest source was ranged from the early 2000s.
 * 1) In the talk page, there has been comments on how editors have changed certain information the author had previously mentioned. For instance, the weight of the vulture was changed and provided citations on where they got the information.
 * 2) The article is rated as a "Start Class" on the quality scale and as "Low Importance" on the importance scale. Moreover, it is apart of the "WikiProject Africa".
 * 3) Compared to class, Wikipedia address how their extinction is currently occurring with details on the human activities. On the other hand, in class we discussed briefly that they are being extinct but not specifically the way it is being conducted.