User:Isobel.Isobel/Sharlene Santana/Leeperhb Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

isobel.isobel


 * Link to draft you're reviewing

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Isobel.Isobel/Sharlene_Santana?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead section is great. It gives enough detail to make me interested and compliments the rest of the article. You were able to get a lot of information and include a lot o9f sections! Your writing is neutral and concise. The media you included compliments the sections and information well. You definitely used a lot of sources to find all of the information available, and they all seem reliable and relevant.