User:IssaEm/Pelvic inflammatory disease/MadelineMartin7302 Peer Review

General info
IssaEm
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:IssaEm/Pelvic_inflammatory_disease?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists) Pelvic inflammatory disease:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists) Pelvic inflammatory disease:

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Overall, very good job. It seems that a lot of work was put into your project thus far. A couple small things to maybe check before the final submission and questions that came up:

-Prevalence/Incidence:

How do you know PID exams are not included in routine check-ups? Would it be beneficial to add why it's not or is PID being an invasive thing is self-explanatory enough.

Possible spell check-- gynecological

Why is "at-risk" in quotations? Does it need to be in quotations?

-Records Show that...

Are all stats given from the same source?

Maybe add the citations needed with studies that are under that section

* the National Representative Probability Survey + Results was very good. I enjoy that this is included/ kept.

-Populations at Risk

Are citations already included in the Wiki page? Possibly add the citation to the sandbox to give backing.

-Risk Factors

Are citations needed here? If already a part of the Wiki page maybe include in the sandbox.

Would it be beneficial to link or add how specific factors such as pH and bacteria can influence PID?

Are the bullet points what has been built off of your project or is it coming from the Wiki page? Check sources and maybe make sure everything that is off of a study, statistic, or is maybe even medical terminology is cited or linked into the Wiki page.