User:Issavespasiano/sandbox

Look, Israel dose not own wikipedia or reality. If you do not like the term Apartheid Wall, you have to acknowledge that much of the

world does not accept the neutrality of the sanitized term Separation Barrier either. I admit the term Apartheid Wall

is not neutral, it is meant to call attention to Israeli repression and confiscation of Palestinian land, but what court of public opinion

proclaimed Separation Barrier to be acceptable? That is a polite way of describing an ugly fact Israel has imposed on the land and that

it's government and propagandists would like us to resign ourselves to using. In it's favor the term Apartheid Wall is arguably

a more accurate description of events on the ground because it is describing an actual wall. The free world did not use the East German

name Anti Fascist Rampart to describe their major contribution to the world. We called it the Berlin Wall because that is what it was.

Why not use the most accurate of the names given to this creation and the one that it is most associated with when we discuss this wall?