User:Itsjosiah.g/Achatinella concavospira/Yanyan Melhcor Peer Review

General info
User name: Itsjosiah.g
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Itsjosiah.g/Achatinella concavospira
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Achatinella concavospira

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for species native to Hawaii and for the World to meet.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) * Is there anything from your review that impressed you? - I am impress that this person has a lot of information on their topic. (I wish I have that) Thank you for your feedback and the compliment. I'm sure that you have enough information, if not, I'm confident that you'll get enough. 
 * 3) Check the main points of the article:
 * 4) * Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? (and not the genus or family) - Yes, the article discuss topics like where are they endemic, conservation status, and species size. Yes, I tried not to use any information that was connected to the genus of my species. 
 * 5) * Are the subtitles for the different sections appropriate? - Most of their information are in one heading, Maybe try to separate by each section like Conservation status and Habitat. Thank you for the feedback, I'll try to see where I can separate the text. 
 * 6) * Is the information under each section appropriate or should anything be moved? - The author has appropriate info, but it is not sectioned. I will try to fix that, thank you. 
 * 7) * Is the writing style and language of the article appropriate? (concise and objective information for a worldwide audience) - Yes, but maybe theirs a way to word it differently. Can you elaborate please? 
 * 8) Check the sources:
 * 9) * Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number? - There's is no references in the sentences, try adding them to ensure veracity of your statements. Okay, thank you 
 * 10) * Is there a reference list at the bottom? - There's is no references in the bottom, again putting in the references can back up your statements. Thank you, I will do that. 
 * 11) * Is each of those sources linked with a little number? - No Sources are link I believe I added sources, but I'll double check and make sure that they're there, thank you. 
 * 12) * What is the quality of the sources? - N/A
 * 13) Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above):
 * 14) * What changes do you suggest and how would they improve the article? - Add resources, Sectioned the information rather than putting it in one, maybe try to sound engaging too. Thank you, I will add resources soon and make sure that they're sectioned. 
 * 15) * Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready? - Not yet, The author needs to add resources and references, also divide it by sections for easy readings. I will, thank you for giving me ways to improve. 
 * 16) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? -Add resources for verification Roger that 
 * 17) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? -  I like how the author found the average size for his species. Thank you for this, it honestly wasn't that hard since it was mentioned in one of my source.  I will post the sources I used as soon as possible.