User:Itsnotironic/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Horus - Wikipedia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because Horus is cool. Simple as. It seems to be largely well-put together, with mostly unbiased, up-to-date sources.

Evaluate the article
The lead section is mostly fine. It's concise, informative, and thoroughly sourced. I would like, however, to draw attention to the 'citation needed' text floating annoyingly next to Horus' alternative titles. This could use a retouch. The content itself is pristine, well-put together and backed up by relatively up-to-date sources. The tone and balance is likewise acceptable, providing simple facts that nevertheless are rendered interesting by their subject matter. I do have a point to raise about the sourcing. The first source listed is a travel guide. Hardly unbiased. It thankfully seems that no information is drawn from this source any more, but it should still be expunged from the bibliographical record. Additionally, some of the pictures used in the article are frustratingly formatted, being too small to properly examine on a laptop screen. The article's talk page seems to have fallen silent late last year, but more or less seems complete.

All in all, the article seems perfectly acceptable. Some small modifications could be made for ease-of-reading and accuracy, but on the whole it earns a passing grade.