User:Iuliia Gilfanova/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Talk:101 Tower (Kyiv)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I want to help Wikipedia share the history and architecture of my motherland, Ukraine. I lived in Kyiv for around 7 years, and probably I will be able to develop the article, despite the fact that it has a very small amount of information. This would be a really interesting work for me, and I will do my best to make this article good for readers.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section:

- Lead section is good, will be better with more information, but the article itself has not that much of information.

Content:

- Information is up to date, and considers the impact fo the war on the building.

- All the information is relevant

- Topic is not about equity gasp

- Some information is missing, for example about why the building<s reconstruction is on hold

Tone and Balance:

- Well respected laminations

- Neutral

Sources and References:

- One of the sources is a commercial website which may have interest in selling something

- Main usual information from one of the sources was not included in the article about technical innovations in the building

- Part of information from the source about the company who owns the building was not included in the article

- One of the sources about the accident is not included in the article, but the source itself is not reliable

- Advantage is that there is a variety of sources, but they are not 100% reliable as they are Ukrainian news sources

- One of the links doest work properly

Organization And Writing Quality:

- Low writing quality: grammar and punctuation errors

- Sufficient organization

Images and Media:

- Need to add the image of the building itself

- Image with coordinates has street names in Ukrainian, creating some difficulty to understand for non-ukrainian speakers

Talk Page Discussion:

- One if the images has been nominated for deletion

- Author's claim that owners of the building can't pay the reconstruction, was considered as "author's imagination"

- Article has been rated as "C-class" and rated with "Low Importance"

- Article is a part of "WikiProject Architecture"

Overall Impressions:

In overall, the good start is to improve writing quality and sources. Author identified well one the most basically information, but the article has a lot of work to do.