User:Ivan for wikipedia/sandbox

Hi Ellin Beltz. I do not know English well. I use Google translator. So sorry for the poor quality text. Some explanation. There are article - "Ірина Яцура". Relative of Irina Yatsura, wanted to place a photo of Irina Yatsura (hereinafter I.Y.). He asked to do that some people. That people asked me do that. What I wanted to do, is to place scans of photos that gave a relative of I.Y.. I decided do that by filling this photo to "Wikimedia kommons". When I did so, I do not know which license to choose. I chose some license and this led to the fact that this photo was immediately nominated for deletion. And as I understand it because of a license chosen. Then I wanted to remove this picture and fill it again using a different license - completely free license (as far as I understand, the author of photo is agree with the license; as I understand, he want that this photograph became the property of all --but I confess that directly, I did not ask him). To remove it, I posted a request for quick removal. Without waiting for the removal of the first version of the photo, I was able to fill the same picture, but now with a different license (the same file I could fill again, so I make a new export of scan of photos with Gimp). Then I waited when to be removed the first version of the photo (with non-free license). When it happened, I saw that the second fill are nominated for deletion too. I read that in order to image received free license, should be directed to "COM: OTRS". But it can take much time and effort. This is the question. Would you advise the license, under which I could post this photo with the following conditions: Perhaps it is good that this was a temporary license until will be possible to go through the normal licensing procedure. Thank you in advance. With all respectsIvan for wikipedia (talk) 16:25, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) That photo was not nominated for deletion.
 * 2) To not have to spend any long and difficult process;
 * 3) That this license was as close as possible to "free license" (CC0).
 * 4) I had the opportunity (or somebody else) then later, to fill the same picture but with a "free license", after passing appropriate procedures. So the presence in "Wikimedia kommons" photos of this license does not mean that fill it again, but with a free license, is impossible, or extremely difficult.