User:Ivanvanek/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Hindi


 * Article Evaluation
 * The article goes into relatively good detail about different aspects of Hindi, including its history and vocabulary. However, there is minimal information about the language's structure and grammatical rules.  Claims have one or more citations present, showing they are sufficiently supported.  It also delves into historical information about the language and its use in the Indian government as a result of former British occupation.


 * Sources
 * There are 14 sources cited in this article.

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Hungarian language


 * Article Evaluation
 * The page goes into extreme detail about many aspects of the Hungarian language and culture, including different facets of it related to agglutination, writing addresses and names, and phonetics of it. This is a very good example of an unbiased, detailed article.  Claims made are backed up by at least one source.


 * Sources
 * 62 citations

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Morphology (linguistics)


 * Article Evaluation
 * The article provides sufficient information about morphology in linguistics and includes no source of bias. In most claims, it is clear where the information comes from in support of it given a citation, however there are also certain claims made where there is no supporting evidence referenced.


 * Sources
 * 19 citations

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Prague Spring


 * Article Evaluation
 * The article gives an unbiased summary and timeline of the events that took place leading up to and during Prague Spring. All claims present were supported sufficiently with a citation


 * Sources
 * 106 sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Yugoslavia


 * Article Evaluation
 * The article gives a detailed and unbiased summary of notable events that took place in former Yugoslavia before its dissolution in 1992. Although there was not constant thorough support for certain claims, the references to other articles about a given topic and the citations included provided somewhat sufficient support.


 * Sources
 * 37 sources