User:IwearHat$/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this topic because I have volunteered for many animal shelters and my family has fostered in many animals. This matters because many shelters protect animals that are treated with cruelty, and how America can prevent animal cruelty. My preliminary impression was that the article will do a good job of providing good sources of how the ASPCA will prevent animal cruelty.

Evaluate the article
Everything in this article is related to the topic, they do a great job of providing the history of the ASPCA and there is nothing that distracts me in this article. The article is up to date, they provide information from 2023 and provides a lot of recent information on the ASPCA. The article does a great job of representing historical populations in this article. I wish the article provided more visuals, a lot of words can be daunting to an audience, so seeing more pictures could help the audience visualize what the article is discussing. The article remains neutral throughout, they even point out a time where the ASPCA had to pay off a circus for false allegations and did a great job on that topic. There is no heavy bias to a particular subject. The article does well at providing information for some viewpoints, but there could me more information on the "Welfare of farm animals and horses" and "Animal relocation". The links work in this article, I clicked on three sources and all three backed the citation the author used in this article. Every fact provided has an article link next to it. There are neutral sources provided for each link. The sources do come from a diverse array of sources. The talk page discusses edits the author could make to help improve the article, and to help add information. The article is related because it provides improvements. The way they discuss the topic differs from us because they do not have a general discussion for the article, they only discuss to improve.