User:Izzys.young/Kaela Singleton/Gwenf13 Peer Review

LEAD:

- lead is concise however, stating PhD after her name makes the sentence a little confusing to read; rewording the first sentence would help the sentence flow better.

- when referring to someone that you don’t personally know you would refer to them by their last name and not their first name; unless you’re saying the whole name.

- lead includes overview of education and research, you should include a brief overview of her awards and outreach as well.

CONTENT:

- the education section: the first 2 sentences talk about her education, however after that you get more into her career and research; I would move these sentences.

- education; you can provide information on her thesis/dissertation that she did in order to get her PhD.

- education: you should site the sentences for where you got the information from, not just citing at the end of the paragraph.

- research; you should include information as to what one piece of evidence her research’s has provided to the field and why its important.

-select publications; You can link/cite the articles as well so readers can just click on the box and go straight to the source

- awards and recognition; cite 100 woman we love award

- Outreach; elaborate and explain what her outreach is, how does it impact people? What is its goal? How is it actively trying to fulfill this goal?

SOURCES:

- source 2 ‘people’; does not take reader directly to the information, they have to look for it on the page

- add some reliable citations to education

- citation links work

OVERVIEW:

- article is neutral

- view is represented; needs more elaboration and content

- outreach section; needs more information.