User:J.martinez4981/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Han dynasty tomb architecture

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
The article was chosen because it had many missing sources to the article.

Evaluate the article
Lead section

The article has an introductory sentence that has to be re written with more detail.

It does not include a brief description of the main sections of the article. It does not.

The lead is not very detailed and needs more citing to make valid.

Content

The article content is relevant to the topic.

The content is not up to date, last update was on June of 2018.

There is missing citations on the content.

The article does not deal with Wikipedia's equity gaps. And it does not topics related to historically underrepresented topics.

Tone and Balance

The article does have a Neutral point of view.

There are no claims that make the article biased toward a specific position.

There are a couple of view points that are underrepresented, which need more details to improve article.

The article does not include any minority or fringe points.

The article does not attempt to persuade the readers of taking a specific side.

Sources and References

All the facts in the article are not backed by secondary sources.

The sources are not thorough that reflect any more literature.

The sources are not current.

There are no sources from a diverse spectrum of authors.

It does not have any other sources or peer reviewed articles available.

Organization and writing quality

The article is not well written and not easy to read.

The article does have grammatical error, but no misspelling.

The article is not well organized, it is not broken down into sections to reflect major points.

Images and media

Images are included to help enhance the article a bit.

The images are not well captioned, except for one of them.

The images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations.

The images are laid out in a visually appealing way.

Talk Page discussion

On the talk page there are no discussions available about the topic at all.

The article was rated as "Start class" on a projects quality scale, and of "Mid importance" on the importance scale. And it is part of Wiki Projects China.

The way the article is discussed is that it lacks sources to make it credible.

Overall impressions

The overall status of this article is, it lacks credible sources about the specific topic. And the lead section needs

to be rewritten to make it better.

A strength from the article is it contains good details about Han Dynasty architecture.

The way the article can be improved is, more sources can be added and it has to be cited correctly.

The article is under developed and needs more sources and citing about the topic.