User:J.mer22/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Little Red Riding Hood (1997 film)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Instructed by professor

Evaluate the article
The lead has a strong intro sentence, but does not really include a brief description of major sections. Includes reference to another version of LRRH that is not talked about anywhere else on the page. It is concise but almost too concise.

The content of the article is relevant and up to date, as nothing about this film has changed. I would say that the addition of relating it to another version of LRRH does not fit in with the rest of the article, but I am not sure if it is not needed, or if more information about the other article is needed. The article does not deal with equality gaps.

The first link seems to be very basic, and no information is provided other than basic details about the cast. The second link, which I assume would take the reader to the other version of LRRH does not work. The third link is just a general link to the Avignon Film festival, and shows that this film won an award. I would think that there would be better sources for information, as these all seem very basic and don't really provide any additional information.

The plot section is overall confusing to read, and does not flow very well. To be blunt, the sentences seem repetitive and the whole plot is only told in five sentences that don't even tell the plot chronologically.

There are no images besides the movie poster for the film, which I think makes sense.

Conversations on the talk page are bringing up a lot of the same concerns I mentioned in this analysis, mostly because we as a class have discussed some of the issues.

Overall, I think this article has some of the components of a good article, but it is very basic and still needs a lot of work in getting more information on the page. There are also minor changes in things like grammar and spelling that I think need to be added. I would rank this article as poorly developed as it has a basic layout with bare details, but definitely has a potential to be improved.