User:JAVermont/Patagonia, Inc./Hershey2024 Peer Review

General info
(JAVermont)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:JAVermont/Patagonia, Inc.
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Patagonia, Inc.

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The Lead has not been updated to accommodate for the new information. The article it's self is lacking a clear lead sentence or even paragraph that sets the scene for the article. The article jumps right into the company's background without giving an outline. The added content is extremely relevant and provides up to date information. The new content covers all main points and does not have any holes. The content added takes a neutral stance and does not show bias towards one side or another. The content is not opinionated and is not trying to persuade the reader one way or another. The content accurately reflects the sources used. These sources are detailed, current, and written by a variety of creditable authors. The articles are some of the best available for this topic, and the links are working. The content added is very well written along with being easy to understand and grammatically correct. All images in the article enhance the article along with being correctly cited. Overall, this new information enhances the articles impact because it adds the discussion of a very current, and important topic which is climate change.